Legal Opinion

First Stamford National Bank & Trust Co v. Pierce

New York City Court

Decided January 22, 1937PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWatson, J.

The action is for rent for the months of December, 1935, and January and February, 1936, under a lease, the term of which began February, 1935, and ended May 1, 1936. The lease was made in the State of Connecticut on a form customarily used in that State. The premises are located in the town of Stamford, Conn., and the plaintiff conducts its banking business there. Plaintiff is trustee under the will of Agnes C. Bemish, deceased, for the benefit of one William Pitt and others. Pitt, by the provisions of the will, is a life tenant of the demised premises. According to1 ¡the testimony of the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Gray v. Kaufman Dairy & Ice Cream Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1900
  2. Beall v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  3. Levitt v. ZindlerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1910
  4. Stanton v. GrangerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1908
  5. Shannon v. BurrNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1856

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Thorn v. StephensNew York Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Alpha Syndicate, Inc. v. HornCity of New York Municipal Court · 1945
  3. Elliot v. PolnyCivil Court of the City of New York · 1986
  4. Kulawitz v. Pacific Woodenware & Paper Co.California Supreme Court · 1944
  5. Kulawitz v. Pacific Woodenware & Paper Co.California Supreme Court · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API