Ballas v. Cladis
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice McWilliams.
Ballas and others, hereinafter referred to as the plaintiffs, alleging that they were stockholders in the United States Fluorspar & Manganese, Inc., hereinafter referred to as the corporation, brought an action against the following named defendants: (1) the corporation; (2) Peter Bancroft and Nicholas Nicholson, who were said to be officers and directors of the corporation; and (3) Mary Cladis, who was also asserted to be an officer and director of the corporation, and her son Gus Cladis.
In their complaint the plaintiffs sought no relief, as such, from either…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Newby v. BockSupreme Court of Colorado · 1949
- A., T. S. F. Ry. Co. v. Com'rsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1934
- Croke v. Farmers Highline Canal & Reservoir Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1922
- McDermott v. Bent County, Colorado Irrigation Dist.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1957
- Beers v. Denver & R. G. W. R.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1923
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Brault v. SmithMontana Supreme Court · 1984
- Prospero Associates, a Colorado General Partnership v. Burroughs CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1983
- Lowell Staats Mining Co. v. Philadelphia Electric Co.District Court, D. Colorado · 1987
- In Re EllisUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · 2006
- Atchison v. City of EnglewoodColorado Court of Appeals · 1972
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.