Legal Opinion
American Dog Owners Ass'n v. City of Minneapolis
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided March 27, 1990No. C7-89-1741PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
NORTON, Judge.
Appellant American Dog Owners Association (ADOA) seeks review of the trial court’s denial of its motion for attorney fees, which it sought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1988, after successfully bringing an action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Respondent City of Minneapolis has filed a notice of review challenging the trial court’s underlying determination that an ordinance challenged by ADOA was unconstitutional. We reverse.
FACTS
The facts in this case are not in dispute. ADOA initiated this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 alleging City of Minneapolis Code of Ordinances…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Withrow v. LarkinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Texas State Teachers Ass'n v. Garland Independent School DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Parham v. J. R.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Sawh v. City of Lino LakesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
- Hannan v. City of MinneapolisCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001
- Sawh v. City of Lino LakesCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2011