Legal Opinion

Chicago & Southeastern Railway Co. v. Yawger

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided January 23, 1900No. 2,869PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Prom the Henry Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtRobinson, J.

Overruling a demurrer to the complaint is not available error, if there is a special finding of the facts, and there is a correct státement of the law upon the facts found. Louisville, etc., R. Co. v. Downey, 18 Ind. App. 140; Woodward v. Mitchell, 140 Ind. 406.

The facts show that on April 15, 1894, appellee contracted in writing with appellant to do the clearing, grub*461bing, grading, and timber work on tbe extension which appellant was then building between Anderson and Muncie, and to have the same completed on or before June 15 th, for a stipulated consideration; that appellee entered upon…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Hedderich v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Woodward v. MitchellIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Frenzel v. MillerIndiana Supreme Court · 1871
  4. Jackson v. StanfieldIndiana Supreme Court · 1894
  5. City of Logansport v. JusticeIndiana Supreme Court · 1881

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Leader Publishing Co. v. Grant Trust & Savings Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Timmonds v. TaylorIndiana Court of Appeals · 1911
  3. Eisman v. WhalenIndiana Court of Appeals · 1906
  4. Hornaday v. CowgillIndiana Court of Appeals · 1913
  5. Indianapolis & Cincinnati Traction Co. v. Arlington Telephone Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1911

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API