Jackson v. Stanfield
Indiana Supreme Court
From the St. Joseph Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtDailey, J.
This is an action brought by the appellants against the appellees for damages and for relief by injunction, on the ground that the defendants had entered into an unlawful combination for the purpose of injuring the appellees in their business, and that, in consequence thereof, plaintiffs had suffered actual damage, and were threatened with great loss in their business.
By request of the parties, the court below made a special finding of the facts, and stated its conclusion of the law thereon, that the plaintiffs were not entitled to recover.
There was no motion for a new trial, and the only…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Walker v. CroninMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1871
- Carew v. RutherfordMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1870
- Bohn Manufacturing Co. v. HollisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
- Delz v. Winfree, Norman & PearsonTexas Supreme Court · 1891
- State v. StewartSupreme Court of Vermont · 1887
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by50 opinions
- Winkler v. V.G. Reed & Sons, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1994
- State ex rel. Durner v. HueginWisconsin Supreme Court · 1901
- Miller, Etc. v. Ortman, Etc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1956
- Karges Furniture Co. v. Amalgamated Woodworkers Local Union No. 131Indiana Supreme Court · 1905
- Southern Railway Co. v. ChambersSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.