Legal Opinion

Holmes v. State

Court of Claims of Illinois

Decided February 17, 1905Published

1Opinion of the Court

This is a claim by Berto G. Holmes against the State of Illinois for damages for injuries to his person and property sustained as the result of the fall of a bridge over a “feeder” of the Illinois and Michigan canal. Claim is made for five thousand ($5,000.00) dollars, but this is reduced to seventeen hundred and forty-four dollars ($1,744.00) dollars by the bill of particulars filed by claimant. The case is submitted on the evidence introduced by claimant, with the stipulation that in the decision of the case, the evidence introduced in the case of Chas. A. Peterson, Admr. v. The State,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. City of Chicago v. WilliamsIllinois Supreme Court · 1899
  2. City of Chicago v. SextonIllinois Supreme Court · 1885
  3. County of Cook v. HarmsIllinois Supreme Court · 1883
  4. George D. Barnard & Co. v. County of SangamonIllinois Supreme Court · 1901
  5. People ex rel. Hoes v. Canal TrusteesIllinois Supreme Court · 1853

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API