Legal Opinion

People ex rel. Hoes v. Canal Trustees

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided June 15, 1853PublishedCited by 4 opinions

The nature of this application for a mandamus will sufficiently appear in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtScates, J.

The relators ask a mandamus to the canal trustees, to compel them to build a bridge across the canal on section ten. The mandamus is refused upon the ground that there is no legal obligation upon the State or the canal trustees to erect the bridge.

The county road was established in 1835; a State road in 1845; and both relocated and established again in 1853. In 1829, the State dedicated a right of way, of 180 feet wide, for canal purposes. If-this question was to be put upon mere fact of the times of these dedications to public uses, it would appear that the canal was prior in time, though…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Com'rs of Hwys. of Towns of Annawan v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1979
  2. People ex rel. Thomas v. Wabash RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Holmes v. StateCourt of Claims of Illinois · 1905
  4. Village of North Utica v. StateCourt of Claims of Illinois · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API