Legal Opinion
Friedman v. Planning & Zoning Commission
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided June 2, 1992No. 14389PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCovello, J.
This is an appeal from a decision of the Rocky Hill planning and zoning commission denying the plaintiffs’ application for site plan approval of a proposed office building within the town. The issue presented is whether the commission could require the submission of an offsite traffic study as part of the site plan approval process. We conclude that within the framework of the applicable Rocky Hill zoning regulations, a traffic study is an appropriate ancillary submission. We therefore affirm the decision of the trial court that so held.
On September 7, 1989, the plaintiffs, Aaron Friedman and…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Beit Havurah v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
- TLC Development, Inc. v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- Zieky v. Town Plan & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1963
- Nicoli v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1976
- Sowin Associates v. Planning & Zoning CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 1990
3Cited by28 opinions
- West Hartford Interfaith Coalition, Inc. v. Town CouncilSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- Barberino Realty & Development Corp. v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- Cambodian Buddhist Society of Connecticut, Inc. v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
- R & R Pool & Patio, Inc. v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
- Quality Sand & Gravel, Inc. v. Planning & Zoning CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 1999
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.