Legal Opinion

Town of Haddam v. Lapointe

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided August 20, 1996No. 14637PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSpear, J.

The plaintiffs1 sought injunctive and other relief claiming that the defendant converted a summer cottage to a year-round residence without meeting the requirements of the public health code. Regs., Conn. State Agencies § 19-13-B100.2 The trial court rendered judgment for the defendant and the plaintiffs appeal, asserting that the trial court improperly (1) required the plaintiffs to prove that the defendant’s septic system violated the public health code even though the defendant failed to heed the plaintiffs’ notice of the health code violation and failed to exhaust her administrative…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. McKart v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Pet v. Department of Health ServicesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
  3. Conservation Commission v. PriceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
  4. Red Hill Coalition, Inc. v. Conservation CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
  5. LaCroix v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Department of Public HealthConnecticut Appellate Court · 1998
  2. Stepney, LLC v. Town of FairfieldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
  3. Shukis v. BOARD OF EDUC. OF REGIONAL DIST.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2010
  4. Sprint PCS L.P. v. Connecticut Siting CouncilCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
  5. Benjamin v. Weinberger, No. Cv 01-0808816 (Oct. 22, 2001)Connecticut Superior Court · 2001

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API