Legal Opinion

Poulan Weed Eater v. Marshall

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided September 18, 2002No. CA 01-1301PublishedCited by 58 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Karen R. Baker, Judge.

The appellant, Poulan Weed Eater, appeals from a decision by the Arkansas Workers’ Compensation Commission awarding appellee, Loretta Marshall, temporary total disability benefits and additional medical treatment after an admittedly compensable injury. Appellant contends that the Commission’s finding in support of its decision that additional medical treatment is reasonable and necessary and related to appellee’s compensable injury was not supported by substantial evidence. It also claims that the Commission’s decision that appellee is entitled to temporary total…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Farmers Cooperative v. BilesCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2002
  2. Estridge v. Waste ManagementSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
  3. Deffenbaugh Industries & Travelers Insurance v. AngusCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1992
  4. Roberson v. Waste ManagementCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1997
  5. Carroll General Hospital v. GreenCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1996

3Cited by58 opinions

  1. Wilson v. Smurfit Stone ContainerCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2009
  2. Long v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 2007
  3. Liaromatis v. Baxter County Regional HospitalCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2006
  4. Bray v. International Wire GroupCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2006
  5. Coleman v. Pro Transportation, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 2007

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API