Legal Opinion

DeQueen Sand & Gravel Co. v. Cox

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided May 17, 2006No. CA 05-1239PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Larry D. Vaught, Judge.

Appellant DeQueen Sand & Gravel (DSG) appeals the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Commission that found Cox was permanendy and totally disabled due to a compensable injury. On appeal, DSG argues that the Commission’s decision was not supported by substantial evidence. We disagree and affirm.

Cox worked as a rock crusher for DSG for twenty years, a position that frequently exposed him to large quantities of silica dust. As a result, Cox was diagnosed with silicosis on October 19, 2000, by Dr. Charles Hiller. Pulmonary function tests performed by Dr. Hiller showed…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Emerson Elec. v. GastonCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2001
  2. Searcy Industrial Laundry, Inc. v. FerrenCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2003
  3. Clairday v. the Lilly Co.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 2006

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Rodriguez v. M. McDaniel Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API