Legal Opinion

Smith v. Nealey

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 16, 1931No. 22696. Department TwoPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBeeler, J.

This is an action for personal injuries tried by a jury. At the conclusion of the plaintiff’s testimony, the defendants challenged its legal sufficiency and moved for judgment of dismissal. This motion was sustained by the court, and from the judgment which followed, the plaintiff appealed.

The facts are: Appellants and respondents both reside in the small town oi; village of Plaza, Washington. Respondents are husband and wife, and prior to and on the 21st day of October, 1928, owned an automobile which was used as a family car. On the morning of that day, respondent Matt Nealey and a few of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Railroad Co. v. StoutSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  2. Mattson v. Minnesota & North Wisconsin RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1905
  3. Mitchell v. ChurchesWashington Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Hopkins v. DroppersWisconsin Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Olson v. Gill Home Investment Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1910

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Gulla v. StrausOhio Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Wery v. SeffOhio Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Chaney v. DuncanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1937
  4. Krausnick v. Haegg Roofing Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1945
  5. Atkins v. ChurchillWashington Supreme Court · 1948

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API