Legal Opinion
Husky Corp. v. Labor
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided January 19, 1982No. Nos. 44415, 44431PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
REINHARD, Presiding Judge.
Husky Corporation and the Division of Employment Security appeal from a decision by the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission which held that claimant Tony Lee Wertenberger is not disqualified for unemployment benefits under § 288.050 RSMo. 1978.
Claimant was employed by Husky Corporation, working on an assembly line. His employment terminated on March 19, 1980. The dispute in this case concerns the circumstances of this termination. Claimant’s initial claim for unemployment benefits was denied by a deputy on the basis that he voluntarily quit his job. He thus…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Penasquitos Village, Inc., Penasquitos Gardens, Inc., Penasquitos Hills, Inc., and San Diego Leisure Life Village v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
- Brown v. Griesedieck Western Brewing Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1952
- Pate v. St. Louis Independent Packing CompanyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1968
- First Bank of Commerce v. Labor & Industrial Relations CommissionMissouri Court of Appeals · 1981
- McAdams v. Seven-Up Bottling WorksMissouri Court of Appeals · 1968
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Davis v. Research Medical CenterMissouri Court of Appeals · 1995
- Charles v. Missouri Division of Employment SecurityMissouri Court of Appeals · 1988
- Howard v. Labor & Industrial Relations CommisionMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984
- Keaweehu v. 7-Eleven, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2011
- Morotz v. Labor & Industrial Relations CommissionMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984