Legal Opinion

Cimbalo v. BASF Corporation

District Court, W.D. Kentucky

Decided March 8, 2022No. 3:21-cv-00309Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY LOUISVILLE DIVISION KERRY CIMBALO, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 3:21-cv-309-DJH BASF CORPORATION, Defendant. * * * * * MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Plaintiff Kerry Cimbalo alleges that Defendant BASF Corporation, her former employer, retaliated against her for her opposition to race, gender, and sexual-orientation discrimination. (Docket No. 5, PageID # 41–43) Cimbalo also asserts that BASF discriminated against her based on her gender. (Id., PageID # 44) BASF moves to dismiss Cimbalo’s amended complaint.1 (D.N. 7-1) For the reasons…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Bostock v. Clayton CountySupreme Court of the United States · 2020
  4. Crawford v. Metropolitan Government of Nashville and Davidson Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 2009
  5. Kathryn Keys v. Humana, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API