Hyland v. The James Roy
District Court, S.D. New York
In Admiralty. On motion to set aside arrest of vessel by the marshal under process.
1Opinion of the Court
BROWN, District Judge.
The above libel was filed on the 2d of February, 1894, to recover damages to the libelant’s scow, through the alleged negligence of the tng James Roy while having the scow in tow on the 23d day of November, 1893. Upon process in rem the marshal, on the 2d of February, arrested the tug and took her into his custody. The petition avers that the owner of the tug on the 16th day of December, 1893, made a general assignment for the benefit of his creditors, without preference; that the assignment was *785duly recorded, an approved bond given by the assignee, and an inventory…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Hyde v. StoneSupreme Court of the United States · 1858
- Suydam v. BroadnaxSupreme Court of the United States · 1840
- The Union Bank of Tennessee v. Jolly's Adm'rs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1856
- In Re the Assignment of LewisNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
- Matter of Assignment of HolbrookNew York Court of Appeals · 1885
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Swofford Bros. Dry-Goods Co. v. MillsU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Wyoming · 1898
- Gleeson v. The Willamette ValleyDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1894
- Hogue v. The City of FrankfortDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1894