Legal Opinion

Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland v. Purolator Courier Corp.

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided December 27, 1983No. 46608PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtParrino, J.

This is an appeal from the court of common pleas in which appellant, Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland, contests the trial court’s judgment which granted appellee Purolator Courier Corporation’s motion to dismiss. The facts giving rise to this appeal are as follows:

Appellee Purolator Courier Corporation (“Purolator”) is a “motor transportation company” which is subject to regulation by the Public Utilities Commission (“commission”). R.C. 4921.02 and 4921.23. Appellant is a customer of the appellee.

On July 12, 1974, Purolator filed with the commission a six percent rate increase. Motor…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Northern Ohio Telephone Co. v. WinterOhio Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Milligan v. Ohio Bell Telephone Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Erie Railroad v. SteinbergOhio Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Ohio Public Interest Action Group, Inc. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Alexander v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1920

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Cleveland Mobile Radio Sales, Inc. v. Verizon WirelessOhio Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Pacific Chemical Products Co. v. Teletronics Services, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API