Legal Opinion
Ex Parte Rice
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided June 19, 1952No. 5 Div. 538PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FOSTER, Justice.
This is a petition directed to' this Court for a writ of mandamus to the circuit judge sitting in Lee County, Alabama, to require him to vacate his order overruling petitioner’s motion to require plaintiff in the case of Sinclair Refining Co. v. Rice, pending in that court, to answer certain interrogatories propounded under Equity Rule 39, Code 1940, Tit. 7 Appendix.
The equity of the bill has been sustained on demurrer. Rice v. Sinclair Refining Co., 256 Ala. 565, 56 So.2d 647. A reference to the report of that case shows that the bill was to specifically perform a contract…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Standard Oil Co. of California v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- D. R. Wilder Manufacturing Co. v. Corn Products Refining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Twin City Pipe Line Co. v. Harding Glass Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
- A. C. Frost & Co. v. Coeur D'Alene Mines Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Steele v. DrummondSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- John Goodwin, Jr., Lois Goodwin, the Mead Corporation v. George Fischer Foundry Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985
- Twine v. Liberty National Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1975
- Ex Parte RiceSupreme Court of Alabama · 1953
- Thyssenkrupp Steel USA, LLC v. United Forming, Inc.District Court, S.D. Alabama · 2013
- Vesta Fire Ins. Corp. v. LIBERTY NAT.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2004
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.