Ex Parte Hart
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
BOULDIN, Justice.
Section 7774 of Code of 1923 deals with the production of documents under the control of a party to a suit at law for use as evidence by the opposing party. In such case, the court, on motion of the party desiring the production of such document in possession of the opposing party, may after notice require the production of a document “which contain [s] evidence pertinent to the issue.”
In Steverson v. Agee & Co., 14 Ala.App. 448, 70 So. 298, the Court of Appeals, in a well-considered opinion by Judge Thomas, reviewed the history of this statute, defined its purpose and field…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Hale v. HenkelSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
- Federal Trade Commission v. American Tobacco Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Culver v. Alabama Midland Railway Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1895
- Alabama Great Southern Railroad v. TaylorSupreme Court of Alabama · 1900
- Steverson v. Agee & Co.Alabama Court of Appeals · 1915
3Cited by19 opinions
- National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. Alabama Ex Rel. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Parsons v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1948
- Williams v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1979
- Keith v. PadenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1951
- State Ex Rel. Patterson v. National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored PeopleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1956
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.