Legal Opinion
People v. Ruhl
Appellate Division of the Superior Court of California
Decided September 15, 1976No. Crim. A. No. 13989PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
MARSHALL, P. J.
The defendant was convicted of violation of section 21703 of the Vehicle Code on June 12, 1974. The defendant filed his notice of appeal on June 19, 1974, together with a proposed statement. The respondent filed amendments to the proposed statement on June 26, 1974, and July 19, 1974. Nothing else occurred in this case until January 17, 1975, when a hearing was set for January 28, 1975, to settle the statement. On January 28, 1975, the defendant was absent and *Supp. 8the trial court certified the respondent’s amendments on that date. The papers were not transmitted to…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Theodore Way v. Sherman H. Crouse, Warden, Kansas State PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1970
- People v. TuftsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
- Elmer Jackson Tramel v. State of IdahoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1972
- People v. BighinattiAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1975
3Cited by6 opinions
- United States v. AlstonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1980
- WilliamsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
- People v. HernandezAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1985
- Ace Beverage Co. v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
- People v. RuhlCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.