Legal Opinion
People v. Ruhl
California Court of Appeal
Decided September 15, 1976No. 13989PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
63 Cal.App.3d 6 (1976)
134 Cal. Rptr. 62
THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent,
v.
ROBERT A. RUHL, Defendant and Appellant.
Docket No. 13989.
Court of Appeals of California, Appellate Department, Superior Court, Los Angeles.
September 15, 1976.
COUNSEL
Robert A. Ruhl, in pro. per., for Defendant and Appellant.
Burt Pines, City Attorney, and Wade G. McConnell, Deputy City Attorney, for Plaintiff and Respondent.
OPINION
MARSHALL, P.J.(1) The defendant was convicted of violation of section 21703 of the Vehicle Code on June 12, 1974. The defendant filed his notice of appeal on June 19, 1974, together with a…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Theodore Way v. Sherman H. Crouse, Warden, Kansas State PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1970
- People v. TuftsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
- Elmer Jackson Tramel v. State of IdahoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1972
- People v. BighinattiAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1975
- People v. RuhlAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1976
3Cited by2 opinions
- Ace Beverage Co. v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
- United States v. AlstonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1980