Legal Opinion
Robbins v. Ingham
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
Decided October 17, 2006No. COA05-1567PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McCullough, Judge.
Plaintiffs appeal from an order granting defendant Victor Gamble (“Gamble”) and defendant Paul Longhurst’s (“Longhurst”) motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction. Gamble and Longhurst cross-appeal from an order deeming service of the proposed record timely and from an order entered denying their motion to dismiss for insufficient service of process. We affirm.
FACTS
Plaintiffs James Robbins (“J. Robbins”) and Thomas Robbins (“T. Robbins”) were residents of North Carolina. Defendants Leo Ingham (“Ingham”) and Gamble were directors of defendant Trinity Court…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- White v. WhiteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
- Dillon v. Numismatic Funding Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
- United Buying Group, Inc. v. ColemanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
- Chadbourn, Inc. v. KatzSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Brown v. Refuel America, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007
- Saft America, Inc. v. Plainview Batteries, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008
- State Ex Rel. Cooper v. Ridgeway Brands Manufacturing, LLCCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008
- National Utility Review, LLC v. Care Centers, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
- Padron v. Bentley Marine Grp., LLCCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2018
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.