Legal Opinion

State Road Department v. Crill

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided May 5, 1930PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

It has been suggested by the defendant in error that the Court should dismiss the writ of error in this cause upon its own motion, because the transcript of the record contains no final judgment to which a writ of error will lie.

Section 4606, Comp. Gen. Laws of Florida 1927, provides that "Writs of error shall lie only from final judgments," except from an order granting a new trial at law, and it is a rule of this Court that where no final judgment appears in the record, whether a motion be made for the purpose or not, the writ of error will be dismissed (Flournoy v. Interstate Elec. Co., 61…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railroad v. Southern Express Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1883
  2. Ex Parte National Enameling and Stamping CompanySupreme Court of the United States · 1906
  3. Sharon v. SharonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
  4. Wynn v. Tallapoosa County BankSupreme Court of Alabama · 1910
  5. Luxton v. North River Bridge Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1893

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Hatten v. City of HoustonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1963
  2. Bradley v. Etessam, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1985
  3. Hillsboro Plantation v. PlunkettSupreme Court of Florida · 1951
  4. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co. v. Pan-American Airways, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1937
  5. Goldfarb v. BronstonSupreme Court of Florida · 1944

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API