Legal Opinion
Goldfarb v. Bronston
Supreme Court of Florida
Decided February 15, 1944PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BROWN, J.:
We are here dealing with a motion to dismiss an appeal taken by the plaintiff below from what purports to be a final judgment in favor of the defendant below on four counts of an eight count declaration in a common law action for damages.
On July 5, 1943, Irwin Goldfarb, by his next friend and father, Albert M. Goldfarb, filed a declaration consisting of four counts against Walter Bronston, Jr., a minor and Walter Bronston, Sr., to recover damages for serious personal injuries, alleged to have been permanent, caused by the negligence of the defendants. The defendants filed a demurrer…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Ex Parte National Enameling and Stamping CompanySupreme Court of the United States · 1906
- Gates v. HaynerSupreme Court of Florida · 1886
- Mizell Live Stock Co. v. J. J. McCaskill Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1909
- State Road Department v. CrillSupreme Court of Florida · 1930
- Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co. v. Pan-American Airways, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1937
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Russell v. RussellDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987
- Howard v. ZieglerSupreme Court of Florida · 1949
- Southern Railway Company v. BowlingDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1961
- Raphael v. CarnerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1967
- Bailey v. Allstate Insurance Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1969
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.