Legal Opinion

Tenpenny v. Prime Now, LLC

District Court, M.D. Tennessee

Decided April 29, 2020No. 3:19-cv-00420Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE TINA TENPENNY ) ) v. ) No. 3:19-0420 ) PRIME NOW, LLC ) MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion to expand the case management deadline and to amend her complaint (Docket Entry (“DE”) 39), to which Defendant has filed a response in opposition. (DE 43.) Also pending is Defendant’s renewed motion for sanctions (DE 44), to which Plaintiff has filed a response. (DE 49.) Defendant has also filed a subsequent reply to Plaintiff’s response. (DE 50.) For the reasons stated herein, Plaintiff’s motion…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  4. Mary Elizabeth Leary and Glenda H. Williams v. Stephen DaeschnerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
  5. Allen W. Rose v. Hartford Underwriters Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API