Legal Opinion

Hellstern v. Smelowitz

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided January 25, 1952PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

17 N.J. Super. 366 (1952)

86 A.2d 265

BRUCE HELLSTERN BY HIS GUARDIAN AD LITEM KARL HELLSTERN AND KARL HELLSTERN, INDIVIDUALLY, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,

v.

LEON SMELOWITZ, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued January 2, 1952.

Decided January 25, 1952.

Before Judges McGEEHAN, JAYNE, and Wm. J. BRENNAN, JR.

Mr. Harry Chashin argued the cause for appellants (Messrs. Marcus & Levy, attorneys; Mr. Hyman W. Rosenthal, of counsel).

Mr. William V. Breslin argued the cause for respondent.

The opinion of the court was delivered by JAYNE, J.A.D.

This action arose out of the…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Menth v. Breeze Corporation, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1950
  2. Camardo v. New York State RailwaysNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
  3. Morril v. MorrilSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1928
  4. Hayes v. NorcrossMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1895
  5. Consolidated Traction Co. v. ScottSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1896

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Tomaino v. BurmanNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2003
  2. Mundy v. JohnsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Fernandez v. BaruchNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1967
  4. Patterson v. CushmanAlaska Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Glaser v. Hackensack Water Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1958

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API