Tomaino v. Burman
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
1Opinion of the Court
834 A.2d 1095 (2003)
364 N.J. Super. 224
Joseph TOMAINO, Plaintiff-Respondent,
v.
Sheldon BURMAN and the Male Sexual Dysfunction Institute, Defendants-Appellants.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued September 29, 2003.
Decided November 20, 2003.
Walter F. Kawalec, III, Cherry Hill, argued the cause for appellants (Marshall, Dennehey, Warner, Coleman & Goggin, attorneys; Joseph A. Manning, of counsel, Roseland; Mr. Kawalec, on the brief).
John R. Connelly, Jr., Red Bank, argued the cause for respondent (Drazin & Warshaw, attorneys; Mr. Connelly, of counsel, and on the brief).
Before…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Dimick v. SchiedtSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- In Re Sanford Fork & Tool Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Baxter v. Fairmont Food Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1977
- Caldwell v. HaynesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1994
- In Re Boardwalk Regency Casino License Appl.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1981
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Allstate Ins. Co. v. FisherNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2009
- State v. Santino J. Micelli (070453)Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2013
- Kane Properties, LLC v. City of HobokenSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2013
- Rosalie Bacon v. New Jersey State DepartmentNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2015
- Triffin v. ADPNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2010
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.