Legal Opinion

Tomaino v. Burman

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided November 20, 2003PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

834 A.2d 1095 (2003)

364 N.J. Super. 224

Joseph TOMAINO, Plaintiff-Respondent,

v.

Sheldon BURMAN and the Male Sexual Dysfunction Institute, Defendants-Appellants.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued September 29, 2003.

Decided November 20, 2003.

Walter F. Kawalec, III, Cherry Hill, argued the cause for appellants (Marshall, Dennehey, Warner, Coleman & Goggin, attorneys; Joseph A. Manning, of counsel, Roseland; Mr. Kawalec, on the brief).

John R. Connelly, Jr., Red Bank, argued the cause for respondent (Drazin & Warshaw, attorneys; Mr. Connelly, of counsel, and on the brief).

Before…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Dimick v. SchiedtSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. In Re Sanford Fork & Tool Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1895
  3. Baxter v. Fairmont Food Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1977
  4. Caldwell v. HaynesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1994
  5. In Re Boardwalk Regency Casino License Appl.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1981

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Allstate Ins. Co. v. FisherNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2009
  2. State v. Santino J. Micelli (070453)Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2013
  3. Kane Properties, LLC v. City of HobokenSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2013
  4. Rosalie Bacon v. New Jersey State DepartmentNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2015
  5. Triffin v. ADPNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2010

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API