Legal Opinion

Bradley v. Texaco, Inc.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided February 25, 1970No. 7021SC2PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrock, J.

There seems to be no controversy between the parties over the principle that owners of land on the higher level cannot divert the surface water or interfere with its natural flow by artificial obstruction or device so as to injure the premises of the servient owner without incurring actionable liability. See, Phillips v. Chesson, 231 N.C. 566, 58 S.E. 2d 343; Winchester v. Byers, 196 N.C. 383, 145 S.E. 774; Brown v. R. R., 165 N.C. 392, 81 S.E. 450; Porter v. Durham, 74 N.C. 767.

The crux of defendant’s appeal centers upon plaintiff’s evidence of the cost of constructing a wall along the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Ridley v. Seaboard & Roanoke RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1896
  2. Phillips v. ChessonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  3. Rhodes v. . DurhamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
  4. Porter v. DurhamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1876
  5. Clinard v. Town of KernersvilleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Peacock v. Sundre TownshipNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Magnolia Apartments, Inc. v. HanesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970
  3. Ayers v. TOMRICH CORPORATIONCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1973
  4. Shults v. Champion International Corp.District Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API