Legal Opinion
National Presto Industries, Inc. v. Black & Decker (U.S.) Inc.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided March 22, 1991No. 89 C 8978PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
WILL, District Judge.
Pending are two pretrial motions: (1) Black & Decker and Better Mousetraps have moved to bar National Presto from seeking or recovering damages based upon a reasonable royalty; (2) National Presto has moved to strike two of Black & Decker’s affirmative defenses from its second amended answer. The first motion will be entered and continued, as discussed in the opinion below; the second motion is granted.
We begin with the defendants’ motion to bar National Presto from seeking or recovering damages figured on a reason able royalty. Throughout this case,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Keystone Driller Co. v. General Excavator Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Datascope Corp. v. Smec, Inc., Defendant/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1989
- Lindemann Maschinenfabrik Gmbh v. American Hoist & Derrick Company, Harris Press & Shear Division and Commercial Metals CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
- Usm Corporation v. Sps Technologies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982
- Republic Molding Corp. v. B. W. Photo UtilitiesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1963
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Rosco, Inc. v. Mirror Lite Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 2007
- Rosco, Inc. v. Mirror Lite Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 2009
- Undersea Breathing Systems, Inc. v. Nitrox Technologies, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1997
- Geigtech East Bay LLC v. Lutron Electronics Co., Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2024