Datascope Corp. v. Smec, Inc., Defendant/cross-Appellant
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MARKEY, Chief Judge.
Datascope Corp. (Datascope) appeals from a judgment of the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey, 678 F.Supp. 457, 5 USPQ2d 1963 (D.N.J. 1988), requiring SMEC, Inc. (SMEC) to pay reasonable royalty damages of $118,442.05 and finding SMEC’s infringement not willful, and from orders for annually compounded prejudgment interest and post-judgment interest at the Treasury bill rate. We affirm-in-part, reverse-in-part, and remand-in-part the court’s damage award; reverse the finding of nonwillful infringement; remand for determination of enhanced damages…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Story Parchment Co. v. Paterson Parchment Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Panduit Corp. v. Stahlin Bros. Fibre Works, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1978
- Jaffke v. DunhamSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by84 opinions
- The Read Corporation and F.T. Read & Sons, Inc. v. Portec, Inc., D/B/A Portec/kolberg DivisionCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992
- Pall Corporation, Plaintiff/cross-Appellant v. Micron Separations, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- National Presto Industries, Inc. v. The West Bend Company, Defendant/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
- Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company v. Johnson & Johnson Orthopaedics, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992
- The Johns Hopkins University, Baxter Healthcare Corporation and Becton Dickinson and Company v. Cellpro, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
79 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.