Legal Opinion
Community Development Commission v. Asaro
California Court of Appeal
Decided August 8, 1989No. D006826PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
TODD, J.
Steve and Shirley Asaro, who held a leasehold interest in a parcel condemned by the Community Development Commission of the City of National City (Commission), appeal a judgment in which the goodwill value of their restaurant was set at $328,712. The sole issues on appeal are whether the trial court used an appropriate valuation method for determining the value of the restaurant’s goodwill and whether there is sufficient evidence to support the trial court’s decision.
Facts
The Asaros operated a business known as Mario’s Italian Restaurant at the intersection of 8th Street and…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Nestle v. City of Santa MonicaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- City of Oakland v. Pacific Coast Lumber & Mill Co.California Supreme Court · 1915
- In Re Marriage of FosterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
- Community Redevelopment Agency v. AbramsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- People Ex Rel. Department of Transportation v. MullerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Emeryville Redevelopment Agency v. Elementis Pigments, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2002
- Jong Seau Chhour v. Community Redevelopment AgencyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
- New Haven Unified School District v. Taco Bell Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1994
- City of San Diego v. SobkeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- People ex rel. Department of Transportation v. Dry Canyon Enterprises, LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.