Minnetonka Oil Co. v. Cleveland Vitrified Brick Co.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from District Court, Pawnee County; L. M. Poe, Judge. Action by the Minnetonka Oil Company, a corporation, against the Cleveland Vitrified Brick Company, a corporation. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiff brings error, and defendant moves to dismiss.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
MATHEWS, C.
Defendant in error has filed its motion to dismiss this appeal upon the grounds that the time to make and serve the case-made was allowed by the court upon the application of plaintiff in error before the motion for a new trial had been overruled or even filed. It appears that after the jury had been impaneled to try the case and the attorneys had stated the case for each side, the first witness for the plaintiff in error having been placed upon the stand, the defendant objected to the introduction of any evidence on the ground that the petition failed to state facts…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Wagner v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1906
- Burdett v. BurdettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
- Norris v. EvansSupreme Court of Kansas · 1888
- Pratt v. KelleySupreme Court of Kansas · 1880
- Dodge City Water-Supply Co. v. City of Dodge CitySupreme Court of Kansas · 1895
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Clapper v. Putnam Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- Miller v. A. & B. Furn. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- Mascho El Al. v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Dickson v. Minneapolis Threshing Machine Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- Koury v. VogelSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.