Legal Opinion

Dodge City Water-Supply Co. v. City of Dodge City

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 15, 1895PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Error from Ford District Court. Action by the Dodge City Water-Supply Company against the City of Dodge City, to recover for water supplied to the city, etc. At the September term, 1890, judgment was rendered for defendant, and from an order denying a new trial plaintiff brings error. The material facts appear in the opinion herein.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Johnston, J. :

The Dodge City Water-Supply Company brought an action against the city of Dodge City to recover'for water supplied to the city, and also for the costs of relaying water-mains alleged to have been *61made necessary by the action of the city in grading the streets. The petition was in two counts, to which answer was made by the city, after which a reply was filed by the company. Upon the issues thus joined the cause came on for trial; and when the jury -was impaneled and sworn and the plaintiff had called its first witness, the defendant…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Brown v. Galena Mining & Smelting Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1884

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Hopkins v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1924
  2. Wagner v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1906
  3. Clapper v. Putnam Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  4. Cowart v. Parker-Washington Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  5. Burrell v. HorchemSupreme Court of Kansas · 1925

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API