Dickson v. Minneapolis Threshing Machine Co.

On February 2, 1932, plaintiff below, defendant in error, obtained a judgment against the defendants, plaintiffs in error, embracing consolidated causes of action arising upon promissory notes.

Judgment was rendered on the pleadingsr and opening statement of counsel for defendants on the 2nd day of February, 1932. No notice of intention to appeal was given at the time of the rendition of the judgment or within ten days thereafter, but the defendants relied upon motion for new trial which was filed the fo'lowing day and overruled on February 23, 1932.

Petition in error with case-made was filed…