Legal Opinion

Stowe v. School District No. 8-C

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided June 3, 1965PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSloan, J.

By this mandamus proceeding plaintiff seeks to compel defendant school district to offer him a contract as a teacher for the school year beginning in September, 1964. Plaintiff had been employed as a teacher by the district for several years. Prior to March 15, 1964, the district gave notice to plaintiff that he would not be offered a contract for the ensuing school year. Plaintiff, in writing, asked the district school board to put in its records the reason for not renewing his contract. A statute, later quoted, required the board to record its reasons. The board, for some unexplained…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Perry v. Oregon Liquor Control CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1947

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Couey v. AtkinsOregon Supreme Court · 2015
  2. Yancy v. ShatzerOregon Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Bock v. Bend School District No. 1Oregon Supreme Court · 1968
  4. George v. SCHOOL DIST. NO. 8R, UMATILLA CTY.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1971
  5. Owens v. School Dist. No. 8R of Umatilla CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1970

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API