Legal Opinion
Seattle National Bank v. Becker
Washington Supreme Court
Decided July 23, 1913No. 11139PublishedCited by 10 opinions
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Mackintosh, J., entered October 7, 1912, in favor of the plaintiff, upon sustaining a demurrer to affirmative defenses, in an action on a promissory note.
1Opinion of the CourtMorris, J.
— Appeal from a judgment upon a promissory note, after sustaining a demurrer to affirmative defenses.
The appellants pleaded two affirmative defenses. The first need not be referred to, as in our judgment it was demurrable. The second affirmative defense was as follows :
“That on or about the 1st day of June, 1911, the Pacific Steel Furniture Co., being indebted to the plaintiff, was required to give a note in renewal thereof and these defendants were requested by said bank to endorse said note; that it was agreed that as a further endorser on said note the plaintiff *432would secure the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- McCormick Harvesting Machine Co. v. FaulknerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1895
- City of Seattle v. L. H. Griffith Realty & Banking Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1902
- Young v. SmithWashington Supreme Court · 1896
3Cited by10 opinions
- Walker v. CopelandWashington Supreme Court · 1937
- Roddy v. Citizens' State Bank of CopevilleCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928
- Nelson Equipment Co. v. GoodmanWashington Supreme Court · 1953
- Blaine v. DarwinWashington Supreme Court · 1931
- Dickson v. ProtzmanWashington Supreme Court · 1923
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.