Legal Opinion

Brown v. Page

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided November 27, 1922PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBurpee, J.

Neither of the plaintiffs has claimed that the verdict of the jury in either case was against the evidence. In both cases the reasons of appeal are the same, and relate solely to specified parts of the charge to the jury and to refusals to charge as requested by the plaintiffs jointly. In considering the merits of these reasons, it must be remembered that it is the duty of the court in its charge to the jury to give instructions correct in law, and adapted to the issues raised by the pleadings and the evidence produced in support of those issues and against them, and sufficient to guide the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Radwick v. GoldsteinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1916
  2. Smith v. Connecticut Railway & Lighting Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1907
  3. Hawkins v. Garford Trucking Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1921
  4. Rohloff v. Fair Haven & Westville RailroadSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1904
  5. Andrews v. DoughertySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1921

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Tipton v. BursonArizona Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Rutkowski v. Connecticut Light & Power Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1923
  3. Marfyak v. New England Transportation Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1935
  4. Rohde v. NockSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1924
  5. Boyd v. GearySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1940

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API