Peter Schuman, et al. v. Microchip Technology Incorporated, et al.

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 PETER SCHUMAN, et al., Case No. 16-cv-05544-HSG 8 Plaintiffs, ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO AMEND SCHEDULING 9 v. ORDER TO REOPEN DISCOVERY 10 MICROCHIP TECHNOLOGY Re: Dkt. No. 226 INCORPORATED, et al., 11 Defendants. 12 13 Pending before the Court is Defendants’ motion to amend the scheduling order to reopen 14 discovery. See Dkt. No. 226 (“Mot.”). Briefing on this motion is complete. See Dkt. No. 232 15 (“Opp.”); Dkt. No. 235 (“Reply”). The Court finds this matter appropriate for disposition without 16 oral…