Legal Opinion
Peter Schuman, et al. v. Microchip Technology Incorporated, et al.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided August 3, 2026No. 4:16-cv-05544Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 PETER SCHUMAN, et al., Case No. 16-cv-05544-HSG 8 Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL 9 v. Re: Dkt. No. 251 10 MICROCHIP TECHNOLOGY INCORPORATED, et al., 11 Defendants. 12 13 Pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion for preliminary approval of class action 14 settlement. See Dkt. No. 251. The Court held a hearing on the motion. For the reasons detailed 15 below, the Court GRANTS the motion. 16 I. BACKGROUND 17 A. Factual Allegations and Procedural History 18 This is a long-running ERISA…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Staton v. Boeing Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Rodriguez v. West Publishing Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Archdiocese of Milwaukee Supporting Fund, Inc. v. Mercury Interactive Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Syncor Erisa Litigation v. Cardinal Health, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Robert Briseno v. Conagra Foods, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.