Legal Opinion

Adams v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided February 5, 2021No. 20-783Published

1Opinion of the Court

In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 20-783C (Filed: February 5, 2021) ___________________________________ ) Claim by prison guards and food CODY L. ADAMS, et al., ) workers for hazardous duty pay or ) environmental differential pay; 5 Plaintiffs, ) U.S.C. §§ 5545(d), 5343(c)(4); ) work with, and in close proximity v. ) to, persons infected with COVID- ) 19 virus UNITED STATES, ) ) Defendant. ) ___________________________________ ) Theodore R. Coploff, McGillivary Steele Elkin LLP, Washington, D.C., for plaintiffs. Eric E. Laufgraben, Senior Trial Counsel, Commercial Litigation…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Sullivan v. StroopSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  5. Sorenson v. Secretary of the TreasurySupreme Court of the United States · 1986

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API