Legal Opinion · Dissent

Sheffield v. Schering Plough Corp.

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided August 9, 1996Published

1DissentPollock, J.

The Division of Workers’ Compensation (the Division) dismissed the petition of petitioner, Lodean Sheffield, because she had failed to file for workers’ compensation benefits within two years after she first “knew of the disability and its relation to the employment.” N.J.S.A. 34:15-34. In affirming the dismissal, the Appellate Division succinctly summarized the findings of the Division.

The Division judge held that petitioner sustained orthopedic and neurological disabilities arising out of her employment with Schering, but that her claims for such injuries and disabilities were barred by the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Bradley v. Henry Townsend Moving & Storage CompanySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1979
  2. De Asio v. City of BayonneNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1960
  3. Dunay v. International Smelting & Refining Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1960
  4. Milos v. Exxon Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1995
  5. Milos v. Exxon Co., USASupreme Court of New Jersey · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API