Legal Opinion
Milos v. Exxon Co., USA
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided February 22, 1996PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Per curiam
The judgment is affirmed, substantially for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge Rodriguez of the Appellate Division, reported at 281 N.J.Super. 194, 656 A.2d 1300 (1995).
For affirmance — Chief Justice WILENTZ and Justices HANDLER, POLLOCK, O’HERN, STEIN and COLEMAN — 6.
Opposed — none.
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Milos v. Exxon Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1995
3Cited by5 opinions
- Sheffield v. Schering Plough Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1996
- Henry v. New Jersey Department of Human ServicesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2010
- Henry v. New Jersey Department of Human ServicesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2010
- Sheffield v. Schering Plough Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1996
- Sheffield v. Schering Plough Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1996