Legal Opinion

Dunay v. International Smelting & Refining Co.

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided March 29, 1960PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

60 N.J. Super. 546 (1960)

160 A.2d 80

JOHN A. DUNAY, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT,

v.

INTERNATIONAL SMELTING & REFINING CO., RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Middlesex County Court, Law Division.

Decided March 29, 1960.

Mr. William F. Nies, attorney for the petitioner-respondent (Mr. Graham Roskein, of counsel).

Messrs. Toolan, Haney & Romond, attorneys for the respondent-appellant (Mr. James P. Haney, appearing).

KALTEISSEN, J.C.C. (temporarily assigned).

This is an appeal from a final judgment of the Department of Labor and Industry, Division of Workmen's Compensation, in favor of…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Ciuba v. Irvington Varnish & Insulator Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1958
  2. Russo v. United States Trucking Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1958
  3. Ricciardi v. Marcalus Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1958
  4. Riccioni v. American Cyanamid Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1953
  5. Sampson v. ThorntonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1952

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Frost v. Anaconda Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Andersen v. Well-Built Homes of Central Jersey, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1961
  3. Sheffield v. Schering Plough Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1996
  4. Quiles v. New Jersey Metals Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1962
  5. Sheffield v. Schering Plough Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1996

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API