Legal Opinion

Wehunt v. Babb

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided June 14, 1951No. 33469PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MacIntyre, P. J:

The nature of the action, one ex con tractu, is unquestioned. The major point of difference between counsel for the respective parties is whether the suit is for the breach of an exclusive real-estate brokerage contract, or one for the breach of an exclusive sales-agent contract. Counsel for the plaintiff contend that it is the former, while counsel for the defendant contend it is the latter.

It is, of course, elementary that the character and classification of the action depend upon the intrinsic contents of the petitions, its recital of facts, etc. (Hubbard v. Bibb Brokerage…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Fenn v. Ware & OwensSupreme Court of Georgia · 1897
  2. Humphries & Jackson v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1908
  3. Robinson v. WellerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1888
  4. Gray v. LynnSupreme Court of Georgia · 1913
  5. Winer v. Flournoy Realty Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1921

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Teague v. Adair Realty & Loan Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1955
  2. Suburban Realty, Inc. v. BusbinCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975
  3. Chastain v. AllisonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1970
  4. Norwood v. RobieCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1960
  5. Parr Realty Co. v. CarrollCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API