Legal Opinion

Busbin v. Suburban Realty, Inc.

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided May 5, 1976No. 30824PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Undercofler, Presiding Justice.

Certiorari was granted in this case to review the ruling of the Court of Appeals in Suburban Realty, Inc. v. Busbin, 136 Ga. App. 850 (222 SE2d 627) (1975). Division 1 of that opinion held that the language of the sale contract "contemplates an actual sale of the realty before the right to commission arises” and that the case fell within the ruling made in Ragsdale v. Smith, 110 Ga. App. 485 (138 SE2d 916) (1964). There is no assignment of error on this portion of the ruling in Division 1. See Rule 36 (c), Supreme Court (1975). Division 2 of the opinion holds…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Ragsdale v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1964
  2. Roberts v. Prater & ForresterCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1922
  3. Rowland v. KraftCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1924
  4. Suburban Realty, Inc. v. BusbinCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975
  5. Broyles v. HaasCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1935

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Kinard Realty, Inc. v. EvansCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1979
  2. Metaxis v. SandersCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1979
  3. Stone Mountain Abstract Co. v. Alcovy Realty Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1977
  4. Coldwell Banker Commercial Group, Inc. v. NodvinDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1984
  5. Coldwell Banker Commercial Group, Inc. v. NodvinDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1984

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API