Legal Opinion

Amir Edwards v. New American Funding, LLC

District Court, C.D. California

Decided August 23, 2023No. 2:23-cv-05675Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 AMIR EDWARDS, Case No. 2:23-cv-05675-FLA (ASx) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY 13 v. ACTION SHOULD NOT BE REMANDED FOR LACK OF 14 SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION NEW AMERICAN FUNDING, LLC, et 15 al. 16 Defendants. 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 Federal courts are courts of “limited jurisdiction,” possessing only “power 2 authorized by the Constitution and statute[.]” Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Ins. Co. of 3 Am.,

511 U.S. 375, 377

(1994); U.S. Const. art. III, § 2, cl. 1. Courts are presumed to 4 lack…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Frank D. Gaus v. Miles, Inc., an Indiana CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
  3. Ruhrgas Ag v. Marathon Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
  4. Douglas Leite v. Crane CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
  5. Thompson v. GraySupreme Court of the United States · 1816

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API