Legal Opinion
(PS)Williams v. Amazon.Com, Inc.
District Court, E.D. California
Decided October 6, 2020No. 2:20-cv-00513Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 KIRK D. WILLIAMS, No. 2:20-cv-513-TLN-JDP PS 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 AMAZONE.COM INC., 15 Defendant. 16 17 Plaintiff seeks leave to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915.1 His 18 declaration makes the showing required by 28 U.S.C. §1915(a)(1) and (2). See ECF No. 2. 19 Accordingly, the request to proceed in forma pauperisis granted. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). 20 Determining that plaintiff may proceed in forma pauperis does not complete the required 21 inquiry. Pursuant to § 1915(e)(2),…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Hospital Building Co. v. Trustees of Rex HospitalSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Molski v. M.J. Cable, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.