Legal Opinion

Burchfield v. Hodges

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Decided March 14, 1946PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHale, J.

Both the complainants and the defendant have appealed from the Chancellor’s decision. His findings of fact and conclusions of law are as follows:

"1) Complainants are the owners of a tract of land containing 300 acres, more or less in Sevier County. On this tract was a large amount of timber suitable for lumber.
“2) Defendant, W. E. Hodges, is in the general lumber business which is used in building and construction work. He handles mostly pine and hardwood, and he buys boundaries of timber and lias the same cut and manufactured into lumber. He sells lumber wholesale and retail. He does not…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Hicks v. SprankleTennessee Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Edgcomb v. CloughSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
  3. Pittsburg Lumber Co. v. ShellTennessee Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Trapp v. McCormickTennessee Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Allen v. EfflerTennessee Supreme Court · 1921

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Bokor v. HolderCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1986
  2. Hooton v. Nacarato GMC Truck, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1989
  3. KNOX JEWELRY, INC. v. Cincinnati Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1974
  4. Clark v. FarrellCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API