Legal Opinion

McGinnis v. Old Fort Finishing Plant

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 14, 1960No. 26PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWinboRne, C. J.

Plaintiff, appellant, in brief filed states this as the questions involved on this appeal: “Did defendants, by their conduct, waive the provisions of G.S. 97-47 as a defense to plaintiff’s claim for compensation, and are said defendants now estopped to plead said statute in bar of plaintiff’s right to recover herein.”

In this connection the North Carolina Industrial Commission has authority under G.S. 97-80 to make rules, not inconsistent with Article One of the Workmen’s Compensation Act, for carrying out the provisions thereof. Pursuant thereto the Commission has adopt ed a rule…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Fetner v. Rocky Mount Marble & Granite WorksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
  2. Fox v. Cramerton Mills, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
  3. Waddell v. CarsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
  4. Brice v. Robertson House Moving, Wrecking & Salvage Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1958
  5. Hildebrand v. McDowell Furniture Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1937

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Perry v. American Bakeries CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
  2. Sandy v. Stackhouse IncorporatedSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  3. Byrd v. Farmers Federation CooperativeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API