Legal Opinion

Haney v. White & Case LLP

District Court, D. South Carolina

Decided May 1, 2020No. 2:19-cv-02098Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA CHARLESTON DIVISION Katherine St. John Haney and James Byrnes,) Civil Action No. 2:19-cv-2098-RMG as Personal Representatives of the Estate ) of Muriel T. Farr ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ORDER AND OPINION ) v. ) ) Michael E. Kavoukjian, Esq., ) and White & Case, LLP ) ) Defendants. ) ___________________________________ ) Before the Court is a judgment on the pleadings filed by Plaintiffs Katherine St. John Haney and James Byrnes as Personal Representatives of the Estate of Muriel T. Farr. (Dkt. No. 16.) For the reasons set forth below, the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Smith v. HaynsworthSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1996
  2. Holy Loch Distributors, Inc. v. HitchcockSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
  3. Spence v. WingateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2011
  4. Eagle Nation, Inc. v. Market Force, Inc.District Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2001
  5. John S. Clark Co., Inc. v. United Nat'l. Ins. Co.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2004

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API