Legal Opinion

United States v. M/V Santa Clara I

District Court, D. South Carolina

Decided August 5, 1994No. Civ. A. 2:92-0389-18PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

NORTON, District Judge.

I. BACKGROUND

The action with which this order is concerned is a fourth-party action for indemnity, both contractual and equitable, brought by Degesch De Chile, Ltda., (hereinafter “De-gesch Chile”) against A. Hardrodt Chile, S.A., (hereinafter “Hardrodt”) in which De-gesch Chile is seeking to recover all damages recovered against it by Defendants and Third-Party Plaintiffs, Kyriakopoulos Inter-nacional, S.A., (hereinafter “Kyriakopoulos”) and Empresa Naviera Santa, S.A., (hereinafter “Empresa”), or Third-Party Defendant, Degesch America, Inc., (hereinafter…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  5. Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Thypin Steel Co. v. Asoma Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
  2. Butler v. Ford Motor Co.District Court, D. South Carolina · 2010
  3. DTEX, LLC v. BBVA Bancomer, S.A.District Court, D. South Carolina · 2005
  4. United States v. M/V Santa Clara IDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 1995
  5. Hamburg Sudamerikanische Dampfschiffahrts-Gesellschaft KG v. Texport, Inc.District Court, D. South Carolina · 2013

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API